Internal Documentation

Valentine Edition

February 14, 2025 (Review of Week 7)

Hi everyone! During our Valentine’s edition of Brownbag, Jeremy shared that he learned a better browser tab management from watching Chuck, and (while his main point was about the value of pairing) it reminded me of an article I read recently about Zen, a new Firefox-based browser. Now, I am a bit of a die-hard Arc browser fangirl, but curiosity got the better of me and I tried it out this morning. This guy at ZDNet does a much better job of describing it than I will, but I will say this: If you’re still using vanilla Chrome, try these alternatives with better workspace and tab management!

Metrics

  • Unique Buildings: 5,998 (January, +56 MoM)
  • Annual Run Rate: $1.28M
  • Monthly net burn (accrual basis): $111,027 (3-month avg through January)
  • Year-to-Last Month net burn (cash basis): $178,403 (January only)
  • 2025 Transaction fees to date: $0
  • Outstanding invoices as of today: $185,280.46 (-$1,541 WoW or -.83% WoW)

Last Week’s Highlights

  • Both Bomee and Jason had 360s this week! I should be used to it by now, but each time I’m grateful that we have a culture of openness, feedback, and transparency that goes beyond wishful thinking, especially with the real impact and progress between 360s. (FH) +1 from JB
  • While the NYSERDAta (Building Data Platform RFP) is still not signed, we are making progress on identifying talent to help us with the project. (FH)
  • Great seeing progressing on Mini-UI. It’s going to be great when we can unveil it, and I think we should make a big deal about it on LinkedIn. Apparently, some folks are saying we’ve “gone silent” (BJ)
  • We had a ping from folks working on London retrofits and LA BEPS. We’re not quite ready for them, but it’s nice to see we will have some calls to make when we are! (BJ)
  • Personal highlight was getting my local install set up. It took longer than I had hoped, but it only took 3 tries! Hopefully documentation updates will make it even smoother next time. Thanks to everyone who helped me when I got stuck in the reeds! (BJ)
  • I was able to join a few of the listening tour sessions with service providers. I’m really glad I can be a part of these conversations, which will us some great input to our near- and long-term plans. (JB)

Any missing highlights? Please share in Slack comments.

Crow’s Nest

Looking out for icebergs: What are the risks on the horizon that we’re watching for and navigating around?

François’ List

Same as last week:

  • Schrödinger’s RFPs
  • Keeping momentum on AI why tackling large new challenges

Bomee’s List

  • NYC Accelerator, due March 7. We should be further along than we are, and it’s been a difficult, chaotic process. It would make a huge difference to win it; we’re the team to beat; and I hope Willdan gets its shit together.

Carry over from last week:

  • Eye on cash management
  • ConEd rebid coming up - needs prep work from me and Marc
  • Prod motion and velocity - I feel like we’re making progress there

Erika’s List

  • I had deprioritized getting all the HR documentation on policies and practices into the handbook (it’s all written out and complete) but it needs to be visible and shared out.
  • In a similar HR/people vein, we want to make sure we are set to scale and bring on any new people once we’re ready to hire. This means getting feedback on that documentation (e.g. worldwide work policy, onboarding process) and sharing what we’ve also been looking at (onboarding process and diversity, hiring and compliance in a shifting landscape). This is a current area of focus.

Jason’s List

Basically the same from last week:

  • Still waiting on RFP news…and now we’ve heard that Lee Zeldin wants to take the Climate United money back, I guess I’ll stop holding my breath about our CPC GGRF proposal.
  • What do Service Providers want to do, and how do they see Momentum helping them?
  • We made some great progress de-duplicating team_buildings, but what other time bombs are lurking in the code? Is it time for a round of minesweeper?
  • Figuring out a sustainable sprint planning routine that allows us to reliably ship on time and to know what will be in the release–and move faster. We’re going to have 4 minor releases out the door before the big UI update. It’s great that we’re flexible to ship things when ready and needed, but I fear that going off schedule a bit is causing some confusion and will limit our ability to understand our velocity.
  • Updating our project workflow. Talking with Marc about it this week, I think he summarized the need nicely as needing to make the workflow steps more apparent to our users and lowering the bar for each step.

  • Marc’s List

same from last week:

  • We need more and better feedback from users and potential users
  • The Con Ed (2026) RFP is not going to be a copy and paste of the last 3 years – how do we best position ourselves?

On Deck for This Week

  • For those of us with kids in NYC public schools, it’s mid-winter break!
  • Looking for a LOT of progress on NYCA RFP draft proposal. Only 3 weeks to go!
  • Releases: 89.4 (bug fixes); 90 Mini-UI. The status on this is that we’re not yet sure of release date for Mini-UI. Whenever we do fix it, there is some promotional stuff that we should do as a quick follow-on.
  • I’m OOO but would like feedback on the onboarding process, which I will share in Slack! (EP)
  • Hopefully getting agreement on the Willdan 2025 SOW–we have meeting to review our comments this Friday. (JB)
  • Service provider interview with BrightPower (MZ)
  • Kicking off initial planning for new subscription agreement with L&M Development Partners and Con Edison (MZ)

  • Here’s what’s on the Company Radar

Please Leave Feedback

Please note your reaction to this update in the Slack channel. It helps us to know what is resonating, what is unclear, etc. Thanks!

  • What are your highlights / lowlights?
  • Did we miss a highlight? Something else you want to react to?